Skip to main content

"Would the Gov let Christ Cure Cancer?" An Excellent Article by Jon Rappoport UPDATED W ADDED 411 LINK ** second update 10 dec 21***

I had told my fellow wellness students, during a brief stint at CalU, that, "if we were all there with the sole intent to help GET PEOPLE WELL, then we truly, were to become the, PRIESTS OF THE NEW MILLENNIUM." Not a soul, "got it." However, my belief and message intent was this; people who are truly WELL, FROM WITHIN, need for nothing.  They don't need to spend on THINGS, legal or illegal drugs, booze, tobacco, SEX, etc., as they are HAPPY from within.


They don't want you well.  Sick people are easier to control, and it PAYS rather well for them too.

Lastly, even though I had been a human garbage can, and on a quest to destroy myself for the first 24 years of my life, oddly enough, and just as through it all, I had a love for God, I have always been into holistic wellness. I have never adhered to western medicine.  So, I was already slanted that way.  But, when my adopted mom was dying, (of breast cancer), she, who also had been basically, a holistic the whole time I knew her as well, had said, "they (western med) aren't in the business to HEAL, for, there's no money in it!" My mother, who purported to have a relationship with God, for some reason feared death (of this life), so she tried all different kinds of trials, etc.  I think, in the end, she forgot to put her faith in God, and instead put it in western medicine (which will always be a let down).  IDK.  And, I've digressed!

Anyway, I found the Jon Rappoport article, on point, sad, though also funny.  It's Idiocracy, this life, truly.

Have a blessed day!

Interesting to note: I can actually get in legal trouble for sharing what I did in my post entitled, FOOD.  For suggesting to stay away from GMO.

***I am not suggesting anyone drop western medicine.  I am merely suggesting another way.  And always, do what is right, for you.


I came across an excellent article to support my stance above. It's in RE: black oil in synthetic drugs. 

Please read with an open mind.  Godbless



 the government let Jesus cure cancer?


by Jon Rappoport

May 23, 2017

(To join our email list, click here.)

As I’ve been telling you for years, it’s easy to keep the public on your side if you regularly tout medical “breakthroughs” in the press. The latest innovation. The promise of a cure around the corner. The maybe-could-be discovery that will change the course of disease treatment forever.

In this case, a start-up called Tilos has one of those, for cancer. They say it’s an antibody their researchers came across while looking for a cure for MS. They stumbled on to it by accident. Aha.

Somehow, this antibody helps the immune system to recognize and wipe out cancer cells. It produces “a memory” in immune-system cells, and they are ready to go to war when cancer arrives. Or something. It’s hard to say.

The people at Tilos are, naturally, very enthusiastic.

So forthwith, I give you an assignment. Keep track of stories about this amazing antibody as time passes, and see whether it ever a) becomes a real cancer treatment, and b) does any good. Or c) disappears down the memory hole, never to be heard from again. I’m betting on c. Why? Because I’ve watched a number of these flashes dim out quickly and recede into nowhere land. And because, in this case, the company is very far from being able to fashion the antibody into a ground-level treatment. Of course, it’s possible that, on the basis of the recent gaudy announcement, Tilos could pick up some investor funding, but funding isn’t a disease treatment the last time I looked.

On the other hand, if a non-pharmaceutical company or researcher actually makes a promising discovery in cancer treatment (read about the troubles of Dr. Stan Burzynski, Dr. Willam Koch, Royal Rife, etc.), all hell breaks loose. The press immediately pounces on the researcher as if he’s working on an H-bomb in his basement. He must be an outright quack and charlatan, “because they all are.”

Corporate drug outfit=potential breakthrough.

Independent non-pharmaceutical researcher=Dr. Nazi.

Good press vs. bad press comes down to: how much can you pay; who do you know; how much advertising can you afford to buy; what official expert can you bring on board to vouch for you; is your product a drug rather than a detested natural non-patentable substance; can you do officially recognized clinical trials; are you connected with a favored group (university, research foundation, federal facility, pharma lab) who can obtain publication in a well-known medical journal.

Or are you a dreaded INDEPENDENT?

In the 1990s, I watched a federal trial in a Los Angeles courtroom. The defendant was charged with selling medical drugs without a license to practice medicine.

The defendant was prepared to argue that a) the substance he was selling was naturally produced in the body and b) it was effective.

The prosecution moved to exclude such testimony, on the grounds that it was irrelevant.

The judge agreed. Therefore, the trial was nasty, brutish, and short. The defendant was found guilty and sentenced to prison for several years.

This is how the federal bureaucracy operates. “Do you have a government-issued license to heal? No? You’re a criminal.”

I believe that if Jesus of Nazareth were walking the Earth today, in the United States, he would be arrested on the same grounds.

This would be particularly so if he were curing cancer.

Imagine this extreme case: in a stadium packed with 50,000 people who have been diagnosed with cancer, Jesus of Nazareth waves his hand and cures all of them in a few seconds.

Now he is threatening the profits of many companies, to say nothing of the power of the government, which backs the chemo-radiation-surgery monopoly to the hilt.

So he is arrested. He is put on trial. He opts to defend himself without an attorney. He tells the court that curing cancer is no crime.

The prosecuting attorney objects. “Your Honor,” he says, “whether or not this man has cured cancer is beside the point. He has no license to practice medicine. That is why we are here today. We are simply establishing that a) he was practicing medicine and b) he has no government-issued license. That is the scope of this proceeding.”

The judge agrees. The verdict is issued. Guilty.

Of course, on another front, the major media, who depend for their existence on pharmaceutical advertising, take the ball and run with it. The networks and major newspapers seek out “experts,” who emphatically state that what Jesus of Nazareth “performed” in the stadium was mere hypnotism. It was all a placebo effect. Whatever sudden “remissions” may have occurred are just temporary. Tragically, the cancers will return.

Not only that, these 50,000 people have effectively been sidetracked and diverted from seeking “real care from real doctors.” With chemo, with radiation, with surgery, they would have stood a chance of surviving and living long normal lives.

Other media pundits send up this flag: “Many of those present in the stadium were bitter clingers to their religion. They refuse to accept science. They are living in the past. They favor superstition over real medical care. In fact, they are threatening the whole basis of healthcare, since other confused and deluded Americans may now turn away from doctors and seek snake-oil salesmen and preachers for healing.”

From the highest perches of political power in this country, the word quietly goes out to the media: don’t follow up on those people who were in the stadium; don’t try to track them; don’t compile statistics on their survival rates; move on to other stories (distractions); let this whole madness die down.

But among the citizenry, an awareness spreads: the government is controlling healing through its issuance of licenses. That’s how the government is essentially protecting one form of “healing” and enabling it to become an all-encompassing cartel.

What would be the alternative or the adjunct to licenses?


Contracts are agreements entered into by consenting adults, who assume responsibility for the outcomes. In the case of healing, a contract would specify that people have a right to be wrong.

Let’s say two consenting adults, Jim and Frank, agree to allow Frank to treat Jim for his arthritis with water from a well on Frank’s land.

The two men acknowledge that no liability will be attached to the outcome. In other words, whether Jim get better or gets worse, no one is going file a suit. No one is going to go to the government for redress of wrongs.

The well water may be wonderful or it may be completely useless. Both men understand and acknowledge that. But they assert a right to try the treatment, because they are free.

Immediately people say, “This is ridiculous. Water can’t cure arthritis. Frank is cheating Jim. Jim is a victim. He needs to see a doctor. He needs to go on arthritis drugs.”

No, Jim doesn’t have to do anything. He is free.

To put it another way, Jim has the right to be right or wrong. It’s his decision, which is beyond the scope of any authority.

If government tries to remove that right from all of us, it is essentially saying it knows what is correct, it knows what is true, it knows what we need and require, and it’s going to give it to us even if it has to shove it down our throats. Does that sound like freedom to you?

If Jesus of Nazareth lived in the United States today, and if he went around curing cancer, he would be arrested. He wouldn’t be charged with blasphemy or treason. He would be charged with something much simpler and more mundane: practicing medicine without a license.

And he would be convicted and sentenced.

Because then and now, the government, in its throne of corruption, wants to protect its proprietary and illegal interests.

Exit From the Matrix

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrixclick here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALEDEXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

39 comments on “Would the government let Jesus cure cancer?”

  1. Excellent points, Jon. and unfortunate, but most likely true….Ironically, the sponsor of our modern medical system — John D. Rockefeller — is the son of a snake oil salesman, William ‘Big Bill’ Avery Rockefeller.

  2. ecovortx says:

    Like any corrupt individual(s) the further away from the truth the more difficult it is to recognize it. Fear rules the day!

    • jandvig says:

      Perfect example, Jesus of Nazareth…indeed a mystic revolutionary who recognized the insanity of government.

  3. will iam says:

    The guvment is about keeping hope alive, so as long as jesus plays by those rules it will let him cure away!

    ….”Just don’t let them know that they are perfect like yourself and that creation was and is incapable of mistake, you can have at it!

    Just make sure you give us our fair share!!”

  4. Dana Doran says:

    Of course you are correct – Jimmy Carter had incurable brain cancer, he would be dead in 6 months……oh, they cured him? And he’s still here. Two separate medical systems, those with insurance and those with cash money. Guess which one lives? Doctors tend to get to the point when you pay cash.

    • Ray says:

      I would withhold forming a conclusion on Jimmy Carter’s cancer without more detail. Standard cancer therapies can’t cure because they’re toxic to the whole body. Either Carter’s cancer wasn’t as bad as predicted or he had enough strength to survive the therapy.

      Jon – this would be a good subject to write about.

  5. Fuck man. Medical people put cancer causing things into people with so called benevolent vaccinations and then yell, Cancer! What do we do? This is in their mind: We will act as if we are helping people when we are not helping them at all keeping the cycle going with shots that harm people acting like they are the best thing ever.

  6. IMNAHA says:

    Question: What is the only sin for which you cannot be punished? Answer: Suicide. The Roman Catholic Church which was “The State” not that long ago has it’s mortal sin list, one of them being suicide. The church used this list of sins to control their property rights and cash flow. So what has changed? Using laws and licensure the State insures it’s property rights and income, and provides a good living for it’s legal vultures. But you say NOONE OWNS ME, I AM NOONE”S PROPERTY – Really? The State doesn’t see it that way, otherwise they wouldn’t monetize your babies birth certificates when you unwittingly sign them up for their Social Security CONTRACT. After that the state “allows” you to rear their property, but only as long as you are deemed to be a fit caregiver.The bottom line is that we are the legal chattel (cattle?) of the state, no matter what you as an individual “believes”. IOW most homo sapien sapiens are operating on a false premise.

  7. Jaanko J says:

    I am dealing with incurable brain cancer in my immediate family. So many treatments – surgery, radiation, then the chemo, chemo and more chemo until the body finally succumbs. So much pain and agony and hope and dashed hopes – to buy a month here, a month there, metastatisis always caused by the drug itself and repeat rinse cycle – steriods to alleviate the swellling before another round of toxic side effects, repeated by metastatisis, then more steriods followed by another cocktail – until – the body succumbs. So horrific and so like a medieval torture program. Enough.

  8. CPP says:

    Best. Title. Ever.

    Here’s what I’m thinkin’:

    “Come one and all to see Jesus of Nazareth and be healed of all that ails you!”

    Disclaimer: These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. Jesus of Nazareth is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent disease.

  9. Mark says:

    “Whoever lives for the sake of combating an enemy has an interest in the enemy’s staying alive.” – Friedrich Nietzsche

  10. From Quebec says:

    The government and the MSM work the same way.

    If they would see Trump walking on the water of Lake Minnesota in one of his rallies, they would say: Trump can’t swim, so let’s impeach him.

  11. thedoctor says:

    In the history of humankind there have been many bad investments, but the cure for cancer sits on the top of the list. In the last hundred years I suspect there has been trillions spent world wide to find a cure that can be patented and then sold to those who could afford it.

    To date there is no cure.

    Millions have donated both money and their personal energy to the cause and nothing. Universities have devoted purpose built buildings full of expensive resources to find a cure and nothing. Grants, fundraising fun runs, donations, research funds in the trillions world wide and NOTHING. I wonder if the same folks behind this fiasco are behind the prison rehabilitation scam?

    • Ray says:

      “To date there is no cure.”

      Because they are looking in all the wrong places. I would revise that sentence to say, “there is no patentable cure.” Cancer cells thrive where the body lacks adequate oxygen supplies. They ferment sugar like fungi. Maybe they are fungi.

      All one has to do is clean up their diet and purge out the poisons. More veggies, less meat and sweets. And most important of all, stay the hell away from doctors. They’re the reason for the high mortality rates, not the cancer.

      • jacobite2015 says:

        I don’t think they’re looking in the wrong places, as I believe science knows a lot more about the pathology of cancer than what we’re being told. For example, a study from MIT last year (that received little attention in mainstream media) shows that amino acids, and not glucose, causes cancer cell proliferation:

        I agree that diet and avoiding toxics as much as possible is very important in cancer prevention. However, that doesn’t guarantee one won’t get cancer. I known some people over the years who were very physical active, ate healthy, in good health, etc., and still got cancer. And for these folks, unfortunately, it was cancer metastasis. Why these folks got cancer under those circumstances, medical science, as usual, has no answers.

        And since chemotherapy is very profitable and one of biggest money makers for Big Pharma, I can’t imagine they would be interested in any real progress toward a cure or improved prevention methods. Billions of dollars in chemo treatment from the millions of customers keeps their profit machine rolling.

        And the doctors? I think Jon said it best on previous posts that they are merely “foot soldiers for the pharmaceutical industry.” I honestly think most doctors could care less if their patients live or die from cancer treatment. It all pays the same for many of them. Their indoctrination & committment to the medical cartel is to diagnose the disease and provide the pharmaceutical treatment – nothing more…nothing less. And many don’t believe in nutrition or supplements in fighting diseases anyway (I wonder how many doctors know about the MIT study, or even care).

        Cancer treatment is a mess, chronic disease treatment is a mess, the whole system is a mess. And the icing on the cake? Medical ERRORS are not the THIRD leading cause of death in the U.S.! 😠

        Welcome to the show everybody.

  12. Oliver K. Manuel says:

    No, Jon, the government would not allow Jesus to heal cancer. I spoke with a medical doctor privately about socialized medicine and the corruption of medical practices.

    I was told, privately, that

    1. Your primary-care physician will probably not be around if you die in a hospital.

    2. The hospital physician’s primary concern is to get you out of the hospital as quickly as possible, and it doesn’t matter by which door!

  13. truth1 says:

    I was very entertained by this post. I see 3 issues here. 1st, if Jesus actually cured people in large numbers, you’d see the death penalty legalized in all 50 states, along with the introduction of crucifixion and burning at the stake or both combined.

    2nd, the courts have already made it clear that we no longer have the right to contract or the right to teach children anything other than what the government approves and no right to determine what the children can have for medical treatment or who to take them to. Government now claims they know better than parents and that they, the gov, in essence own those children, even the children are the direct produce of the bodies of the parents and are sustained by the money of the parents, not the state. And if you discipline the kids or teach them sex ed, or treat them yourself or see an unapproved doctor, or teach a wrong idea, the state can now take your children from you. Mind you, none of it is approved or allowed by the bill if rights but who the he11 listens to that anymore, anyway?

    3rd, no one has the right to contract anymore. The judge of any divorce court can nullify marital contract that does not offer at least as much as the courts do for no-fault divorce, which is a form of licensing certain legal theft in many cases.

    Further, try to contract with an unapproved doctor or healer, who, if he can cure people, by various electrical devices and/or various plant substances and extracts, in effect, making himself a “Jesus” of sorts, you will quickly see how quickly you will find you have no right to contract, whatsoever; even though contracting has long been considered the right of all rights, at least since Magna Carta if not a he11 of a lot longer.

    But I would ask, where do the courts get the authority to forbid or nullify contracts or contracting?
    I have no idea. But the Proverbs say: When the wicked rule, the righteous go into hiding. They more or less have to.

    So I say in all seriousness to parents, learn how to do everything in secret and teach your kids to keep closed tight lips because the government is like a lion seeking prey, and government intelligence agencies love to kidnap, by courts or just by stealing off the street, any child they can get a hold of. There is entire industry of child stealing in the guise of Child Protective Services..It should be called child stealing services. We live in an age of unprecedented evil. Make no mistake about that one! The government’s intentions could not be more clear if they outright published them.

  14. Greg C. says:

    One of the reasons Jesus was hated by the Jewish lawyers is that he healed on the Sabbath – he broke their law. These people were nuts – they lived for the law, and they had no concern for life and healing. Nothing changes.

    • Jonathan Hughes says:

      The government wants people to get cancer insisting that people and pets get vaccinations. The list of cancer causing agents in vaccinations is long.

      • Greg C. says:

        I was wondering when someone would comment on the pet vaccination scam, enforced in many cities by licensing. Anyone know who much money is made in pet vaccinations?

    • bob klinck says:

      Do a search for “shabbat elevator”. As you say, nothing changes. Jesus rejected the insanity of abstract legalism, which has corrupted the medical system and every other system, with his usual incisive authority: “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath.”

      • Greg C. says:

        Exactly! Medicine and the law are to serve people, and not the other way around.

        • truth1 says:

          Great comments by you and Bob. Really, when law does not serve people, who does it serve. For Christians, its the devil, ultimately. But for the more politically oriented, we’ll call it the left, the social saboteurs who want to overthrow order and rule thru chaos.

  15. Larry says:

    But Jon, if we allow each individual his/her freedom to think their own damned thoughts, come to their own conclusions, build their own lives, follow their own stars, make their own mistakes, and not take shit from anybody the world would be a much less predictable place, the pablum of the nightly Mainstream Snews would be mocked/laughed/satirized into oblivion, PEACE might even break out fer Crissake ….ANARCHY WOULD RUN RIOT IN THE STREETS!


    Now that I think about it this might be worth another go after all ….

    • He doesn’t mean all that. He didn’t approve my comment. I thought it was a good comment. It had no profanity, overt sex, or other offensive words. I didn’t blast someone’s opinion… Oh well, I guess Mr R has boundaries when it comes to quoting the Bible.

  16. artemisix says:

    that is a trick question, right?

  17. Oliver K. Manuel says:

    The central theme of this blog seems to agree with the conclusions of the research careers of my research mentor, Paul Kazuo Kuroda (1917 – 2001) and mine (1936 -):

    After science revealed the powers that controls the Sun and the stars, frightened world leaders prostituted science to make themselves appear as gods.

  18. abinico warez says:

    I used to work for oncologist. They know everything about cancer – from cause, to cure, and prevention. But of course they do not publicize this knowledge – it would be bad for business. Try to google ‘free radical theory’ – that’ll explain a lot, if those links are still around.

  19. I will to say what I say until I expire, Jon.

    Though I understand that the “point” of this article was to highlight the disparity between medical solutions and commercial etiquettes, I maintain my view. I maintain my view because it is correct.

    The reason cancers exist at all is due to the fact we are made of carbon. DNA, contrary to science-opinion, is processed at quantum level. Last time I checked, most atoms “look” more or less the same (tiny little balls of light). Carbon ones have a distinct flavour (or “resonance”). Here lies the problem.

    Extraneous matter is regularly collected by our bodies (often as particles delivered by the very air we breathe). Miniscule grains can interfere with our cell structures. If they are made of carbon (like our cells), the “brains” (light) behind management of DNA has a devil of a job to distinguish “good” from “bad”. Therefore, predictably, cellular reproduction can become corrupted. Corrupting agents (triggers, causes and catalysts) are numerous indeed.

    I’ve given you the “short version”, but it should plain enough to understand.


  20. Terry Adams says:

    It is astonishing how breakthroughs are announced, promoted, then ultimately squashed. I have seen this happen on the energy side of the equation – to wit: Back about a decade ago an Australian company harnessed the attraction/repulsion power of magnets and created a beer keg sized generator that produced enough power to run the average house. They were scheduled to be in full scale production within an eighteen month window… Then..”poof!” gone.. disappeared from public view…
    The moral here is this: If what you are bringing to the table doesn’t serve THEIR interests, you may be asked to leave and never get invited back…

  21. BobNelson says:

    If Jesus of Nazareth were to appear in the Second Coming and miraculously cure a stadium full of terminally ill folks, how could he be charged? First off, Jesus would not charge for his services and there would exist no concrete proof that anything he did was responsible for the mass healing. No prosecutor could ever convince a jury that Jesus did anything illegal or that his Cures were more than mere coincidence. The mainstream press would most likely label him a charlatan. And the same Pharisees would persecute and hound him relentlessly until he bacame a public enemy.

  22. Jesus was crucified exactly because he gave freely to heal others.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Popular posts from this blog


Following v Not Following: I'm Beginning to Understand the Rage